In a double banked radial engine, which statement is correct?

In a double banked radial engine, the statement regarding accommodating two throws is accurate due to the design and function of the engine's crankshaft and cylinder configuration. Each bank of cylinders in a double banked radial engine is arranged around a common crankshaft but at different angles, allowing for a more compact engine design and efficient operation.

The linear distance from Top Dead Center (TDC) to Bottom Dead Center (BDC) pertains to the travel of the piston within the cylinder. In a double banked configuration, the design often enables two sets of throws to be accommodated in the same vertical plane, resulting in an efficient use of space and enhancing the engine's power output. The ability to manage this linear distance is critical for maintaining proper timing and synchronization of the pistons within the banks, which directly impacts the engine's performance.

Other options, while presenting ideas about design features, do not hold up as well. For instance, while radial engines can theoretically have an odd number of cylinders, this isn't universally true; many configurations allow for even-numbered cylinders. Additionally, radial engines are more commonly air-cooled rather than liquid-cooled, making the cooling method not as applicable here. The notion that radial engines cannot experience hydraulicing is misleading since any engine